Dating sims deviantart
Wikipedia currently contains three billion articles; 90% of them are either vanity, vandalism, capitalization redirects, conspiracy theories, cabal propaganda, lists of profanities in different languages, video games, video game sequels, video game tips and walkthroughs or a combination of two or more.
9% are random facts about Tamil People, and the other 1% are cited lies, or wikifacts as they are officially known to Wikipedians.
Although the wiki concept encourages everyone to offer contributions, it's understood that very few people are as clever as the editors.
All Wikipedia editors ask themselves the following questions when deciding whether or not to revert the edits: If unable to answer positively to all of these questions, edits must be reverted, with smug comments posted on the talk page of the offending user.
If an editor is unable to find enough appropriate images he is required to create enough to fill the quota or his article will be deleted.
Wikipedia's success in producing accurate and informative articles is largely due to its review process.
They hoped that they could con enough people into giving them money to pay for their bandwidth usage, and quickly coded a button that read "click here to donate to relief funds for the Rwanda genocide." A few thousand gullible paypal users later, and Wikipedia had all the money it would ever need.Also, if an editor dislikes another editor and the editor that is disliked edits a page and the editor that dislikes the person that edits the page, then the person's edits will be reverted even if the edits are good edits. Critics POOOOOOOP LOLOLOLOLOL have charged that this makes Wikipedia an unreliable source OMGIHATE MY TEACHER HE IS STUPID IM GONNA KILL HIM for information after taking a shit.In responding to this, Wikipedia founder ' , and we are working our PEEENISSS shafts to stop potential vandals before they reach the site I LUV TO FUCK MY MOM PENIS!!!!!!!!!!!For this reason, academic experts strongly urge students not to cite Wikipedia..However, much of the behind-the-scenes aspects of Uncyclopedia are also parodied, from the abundance of maintenance templates to the system for rating articles.